Unlocking Human Superintelligence Through Dimensional Thinking
What if there were entire dimensions of intelligence hiding in plain sight—dimensions that the world's most successful entrepreneurs, scientists, and innovators have been quietly mastering for decades?
In this groundbreaking session, I take you on a journey that challenges the foundations of how we think about thinking itself, expanding your cognitive capacity to see patterns, solve problems, and create solutions that seem impossible from traditional perspectives.
Drawing from my decade-long study of polymaths like Warren Buffett, Ray Dalio, and Nobel laureates, I reveal how these exceptional individuals think across multiple dimensions simultaneously—and how AI can amplify this superpower in ways we're only beginning to understand. You'll discover why thinking in just one or two dimensions keeps most people trapped in conventional solutions, while those who master dimensional thinking seem to pull insights out of thin air.
The most fascinating aspect? Each dimension influences every other dimension, creating a hyperdimensional lattice where growth in any area catalyzes development across your entire system. This suggests untapped potential for accelerated personal and collective evolution that we're only beginning to explore.
What We Explored Together
Mapped blind spot protection systems that collaborate unconsciously
Discovered how top performers think across six distinct dimensions
Experienced cognitive dimensionality through progressive visualization exercise
Explored AI's unique multidimensional processing capabilities
Created dynamic frameworks for interconnected personal growth
Practiced expanding from linear to volumetric learning models
Examined how dimensional thinking revolutionizes problem-solving approaches
Investigated metacognitive loops that accelerate growth itself
Connected individual development to collective cognitive landscapes
Developed practical applications for everyday challenges and creativity
AI-Generated Podcast Summary Of The Class
RECORDING RESOURCES
Classes In The Human Superintelligence Track
Prompts Mentioned In Class
Presentation Slides
Class Transcript
Resources Shared
AI Timestamps
AI Chapter Summaries
Chat Transcript
Watch Other Classes In The Human Superintelligence Track
Prompts Mentioned In Class
Presentation Slides
Class Transcript
Resources Shared
Visual Styles
Articles By Michael
Articles & Content By Others
Tools
Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets
The Halo Effect: . . . and the Eight Other Business Delusions That Deceive Managers
The Biased Brain: A Comprehensive Exploration of Cognitive Distortions
AI Timestamps
Course Introduction and Blind Spots Review (0:00:30 - 0:13:06)
Michael's Learning Journey and Dimensional Thinking (0:13:06 - 0:31:16)
Dimensional Thinking Concepts and Real-World Examples (0:31:16 - 0:41:00)
AI's Multidimensional Perspective and Water Example (0:41:00 - 0:55:56)
Cognitive Dimensionality Exercise: 0D to 7D Learning (0:55:56 - 1:21:16)
Practical Applications and Student Reflections (1:21:16 - 1:37:20)
Dynamic Growth Lattice and Course Conclusion (1:37:20 - 1:40:14)
AI Chapter Summaries
Course Introduction and Blind Spots Review (0:00:30 - 0:13:06)
Michael opens the fourth and final class of the Human Super Intelligence module by welcoming participants and reviewing key concepts from previous sessions. He discusses the possibility prompting paradigm and reviews work on blind spots as an avenue for human superintelligence. The class explores the Charlie Munger prompt about how our greatest strengths can backfire, and introduces the concept of blind spots as interconnected defense systems that protect each other from discovery. Students share insights about planning blind spots and safety considerations when exploring these patterns. The discussion includes how blind spots relate to distortions, cognitive biases, and NLP concepts, with participants noting how the class has revealed limitations in their thinking about various projects.
Michael's Learning Journey and Dimensional Thinking (0:13:06 - 0:31:16)
Michael shares his personal learning evolution, starting from age 16 when he began a web development business with limited knowledge. He describes his journey from random learning to becoming more sophisticated about knowledge sources, including learning to distinguish between success due to skill versus luck. He discusses influential books like "Fooled by Randomness" and "The Halo Effect" that helped him understand the narrative fallacy and avoid learning from people who might just be lucky risk-takers. Michael explains how he developed criteria for learning from successful entrepreneurs, focusing on those with multi-decade track records, positive impact, and willingness to share lessons. He introduces the concept of successful people thinking in multiple dimensions, using Warren Buffett's focus on reading and thinking as an example of seemingly counterintuitive but highly effective approaches.
Dimensional Thinking Concepts and Real-World Examples (0:31:16 - 0:41:00)
The discussion expands into how exceptional performers think across multiple dimensions - like polymaths who learn across fields, long-term thinkers who avoid short-term achievement loops, and those who practice integrative complexity. Michael shares a powerful video clip from Clayton Christensen about how Harvard MBA graduates ended up divorced and alienated from their children despite never planning for such outcomes, illustrating how the pursuit of immediate achievement can undermine long-term relationship investments. The class explores how dimensional thinking allows people to see opportunities and risks differently than others, with participants sharing their own experiences of thinking across dimensions like systems thinking, cognitive complexity, and meta-thinking approaches.
AI's Multidimensional Perspective and Water Example (0:41:00 - 0:55:56)
Michael introduces AI's unique ability to think multidimensionally by sharing a conversation where AI describes its experience as being like Times Square - processing millions of inputs simultaneously and seeing hidden patterns and connections. He demonstrates this through an experimental prompt asking AI to share unique perspectives on water, resulting in creative metaphors like water as "punctuation in the grammar of physical reality" and "comprehension algorithm." While some participants find the Times Square metaphor less meaningful, others appreciate the creative reframing. The discussion explores how adding dimensions allows us to see connections between previously unrelated concepts and extract meaning from seemingly unproductive areas, though Michael acknowledges the challenge of making abstract concepts practical.
Cognitive Dimensionality Exercise: 0D to 7D Learning (0:55:56 - 1:21:16)
Michael guides the class through a structured exercise exploring learning from 0-dimensional (binary knowledge) to 7-dimensional perspectives. The progression moves from point (0D) to line (1D linear progression) to plane (2D multiple domains) to space (3D volumetric with depth and breadth) to time (4D past/present/future) to probability (5D exploring potential realities) to interconnectivity (6D collaborative growth) to meta-awareness (7D recursive learning about learning). Participants notice how their understanding shifts with each dimension - losing visual metaphors at higher dimensions but gaining new ways to think about growth, relationships, and possibility. The exercise demonstrates how adding dimensions changes our entire approach to personal development and problem-solving.
Practical Applications and Student Reflections (1:21:16 - 1:37:20)
Students reflect on practical applications of dimensional thinking. Una discusses returning to meditation and journaling to integrate learning. Danny challenges the dimensional metaphor itself, suggesting that metaphors can both open and close possibilities, leading to discussion about using multiple metaphoric perspectives. Kevin talks about breaking down ego-based walls, while others explore applications to problem-solving, creativity, and relationship improvement. Michael emphasizes that dimensional thinking allows people to step outside conventional approaches and avoid feeling trapped in repetitive patterns. The discussion includes how to reduce complex dimensional thinking to practical insights that can be shared with others, balancing the ability to think widely with the need to communicate effectively.
Dynamic Growth Lattice and Course Conclusion (1:37:20 - 1:40:14)
Michael concludes by sharing AI's concept of a "hyperdimensional growth lattice" - a dynamic, ever-evolving structure where all dimensions of growth interconnect and influence each other. This moves beyond static frameworks to understanding growth as a living system with cosmic web-like connections, holographic properties, and Rubik's cube-like interdependencies. The discussion touches on quantum aspects of personal development and the metacognitive feedback loops created by contemplating these structures. Students share final insights about discovering new dimensions of thinking, the importance of mastering fundamental models, and potential applications for training non-visual thinking modes. Michael expresses excitement about the possibilities this dimensional thinking approach creates for solving previously unsolvable challenges and developing new forms of creativity.
Chat Transcript
00:01:18 Janet Ridsdale: Morning, Happy Friday
00:01:35 Janet Ridsdale: yes
00:01:40 Stephen Hendricks: Yes
00:01:48 Marcin Podolski: Hi everyone
00:02:30 Michael Simmons: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XMe2u7Zi0lBt_ZOImSr6vKe7U_WniZM8tQ0HhxSe3yA/edit?tab=t.a9gww9uiz4q#heading=h.2n78z4ug7bb8
00:03:43 Michael Simmons: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iucW5foye-hFmqTYeNFy7hZNRpk7HMIU/view
00:03:59 Michael Glenn: That's my plans for next week: so far I've used GPT mainly for brainstorming... now I want to start using it for planning.
00:04:20 Michael Glenn: "Failing to plan" is a big blindspot for me lol
00:04:26 faythebuchanan: Not paying attention to the blindspots can have significant consequences!
00:04:46 Kevin Whitcher: My blindspot is my homework!
00:05:00 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Replying to ""Failing to plan" is..."
Been writing lots of posts about planning ;-) Just about to post another one
00:05:04 Bonnie J.: The blind spot prompt is really showing me how many things I haven’t even been considering. I used it on a couple different projects that I have coming up and discovered new directions I could take each one of them.
00:05:25 Bonnie J.: And I know I have barely scratched the surface re: things I am ignoring or missing.
00:05:27 Michael Glenn: Replying to ""Failing to plan" ..."
where at? Substack or LInkedIn. I'd love to read them
00:05:31 faythebuchanan: Replying to ""Failing to plan" is..."
My challenge, too!
00:05:35 Jonathan Hughes: I was using a blindspot type prompt yesterday and found out that I was veering too close to trauma when I am not a medical professional. I need to pivot towards those who are not traumatised - from a safety and ethical point of view.
00:05:45 Janet Ridsdale: Working through all the output
00:06:02 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Replying to ""Failing to plan" is..."
http://linkedin.com/in/unadoyle
I’m doing an in person and an online 1 day planning workshop next week and the week after
00:06:33 Bonnie J.: That’s really wild, I had never thought of blindspots being active before. Or collaborating.
00:07:20 Kevin Whitcher: Our comfort zone limit is heavily influenced by our blindspots.
00:08:04 faythebuchanan: I work more with experiential biases rather than cognitive.
00:08:22 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I’ve not managed to do that homework yet - but will use it with my next planning session. I think I added in a bit to a prompt about blindspots?
00:08:54 Michael Glenn: What if we ask GPT "What are common blindspost most people face, and what kind of prompts can we build to help people spot them and navigate them effectively?"
00:08:56 Stephen Hendricks: Had to question some of my past decisions. Nice impact on my engagement with some of the writers I like to study.
00:09:04 Kevin Whitcher: That’s all of us Bonnie!
00:09:42 Dani Trusca: One insight I had: prompting as cognitive tool, not just as an AI interaction tool. Any question is essentially a prompt. Cueing in coaching is also prompting.
I now see prompting as a fundamental structure similar and complementary to mental models.
I identified 3 fundamental structures so far:
Models -- unit of understanding
Brieflings -- unit of meaning transmission (I'm developing this)
Prompts
This is part of a discipline I'm developing called meta-thinking.
00:09:48 Marcin Podolski: Good idea I think is to build "Unfolding Hidden Noise" Prompt based on the newest Daniel Kahnemann's book "Noise"
00:10:52 Jonathan Hughes: This was the prompt that illustrated to me where I was veering too close to a danger zone:
Let's stress-test this. I'm planning to apply [CONCEPT X] by doing [ACTION Y]. Play devil's advocate. What are the strongest arguments against this approach? Where is my thinking weak or my assumptions flawed?
00:11:03 Gordon Raup: Our neural machinery defaults us to being confident about what we believe and think, and certain those beliefs and thoughts are correct. This sets us up to have many, many blindspots at all different levels. Part of fighting this is being aware of blindspots and exploring them as you have shown. But it is also to learn not to trust your thoughts and beliefs fully. To instead "hold your beliefs lightly" as Wendy McNeely once said to me.
00:11:10 Marcin Podolski: Deep layers of blinds: 2nd, 3rd, 4th order effect etc.
00:11:31 faythebuchanan: Blindspots have different functions? Identity protection? maintain safety from discomfort?
00:11:52 Jonathan Hughes: Replying to "Blindspots have diff..."
would be interesting to see blindspots as 'parts'
00:12:31 Kevin Whitcher: Blindspots can be cultural too
00:12:39 faythebuchanan: I have worked a lot with people with Multiple Personalities and have seen the many ways they protect each other. Won’t let information through.
00:13:05 Michael Glenn: Replying to "I have worked a lo..."
That's really interesting
00:13:23 Marcin Podolski: Anand's approach is the most resonating as a superintelligence approach for me. AI Powerd Self-Recursive Evolution.
00:13:42 Michael Simmons: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iucW5foye-hFmqTYeNFy7hZNRpk7HMIU/view?usp=sharing
00:15:54 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I want to see some of this dancing! :-)
00:16:07 Michael Glenn: Replying to "I want to see some..."
Heck yeah!
00:16:30 Marcin Podolski: I've repeated a class twice at high school, now I am addicted to learning 🤣🤣🤣
00:17:37 faythebuchanan: Do we know how many people are interested in learning, and how many are not? I wonder what makes the difference.
00:18:19 Michael Simmons: https://www.amazon.com/Fooled-Randomness-Hidden-Markets-Incerto-ebook/dp/B001FA0W5W/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1697118076&sr=1-1
00:19:16 Michael Simmons: https://www.amazon.com/Halo-Effect-Business-Delusions-Managers/dp/1476784035
00:19:44 Wendy McNeeley: Replying to "Do we know how many ..."
This is my LIFE question, as my career is both as a mentor and private tutor. To be honest, there has been no definitive answer, only suggestions that do not always hold true, thanks to the complexity of humans.
00:20:52 Gordon Raup: Another good book on learning to separate randomness from order is Leonard Mlodinow's "The Drunkard's Walk": https://www.amazon.com/Drunkards-Walk-Randomness-Rules-Lives/dp/0307275175
00:23:18 Michael Simmons: https://blockbuster.thoughtleader.school/p/the-no-1-lifelong-habit-of-warren
00:23:32 Michael Simmons: https://medium.com/accelerated-intelligence/warren-buffett-really-successful-people-say-no-to-almost-everything-ab78832ffebc
00:23:37 faythebuchanan: Are we ever ‘not learning?’ no matter what we do?
00:23:41 Marcin Podolski: Comprehensive exploration of cognitive biases and distortions:
https://www.amazon.com/Biased-Brain-Comprehensive-Exploration-Distortions/dp/1456641182/ref=mp_s_a_1_6?crid=3SFIN4G366S2I&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.lPB9mVkyMFPUAa50Ww4JeXZoQMJaDUUFKzZtLwBDLtzrl7aAZxEGMoaQh6vPkRxh1KJ-IgGKb3_QO6S2AxEAGjM-iOBEEIK6e9-orh_BOvi0V9xFhpe6JWnKCM5S43FjiQ5WahWgkMTpRJ9rP4-k0W_7yo8IJEk2Rds8LMnurUfQ0X6JDhLWGq4o8RfJZnsZwkcczZvBPCM9GV1OwFf_UQ.tcoex1USUQBTxCq47AWQhcGlzRGB5VXyoA97onbx7Zo&dib_tag=se&keywords=cognitive+biases&qid=1749828256&sprefix=cognitive+biases%2Caps%2C221&sr=8-6
00:25:12 Wendy McNeeley: Replying to "Are we ever ‘not lea..."
True but growth is differently than merely learning, hence there are levels of learning.
00:26:03 Stanley Wilson: Replying to "Are we ever ‘not lea..."
no
00:26:05 Janet Ridsdale: no]
00:26:08 Don S: Yes
00:26:08 Stephen Hendricks: No
00:26:10 Marcin Podolski: I see many people attract to one guru and are attached over many years. It is so limiting. Much better is to have a whole web which serves our developmental goals. It uses a compound effect
00:26:45 Michael Glenn: Replying to "I see many people ..."
Yes! It's so much better when we have multiple perspectives to draw from
00:27:11 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I can hear
00:28:35 Michael Glenn: I'm guilty of this
00:28:43 Bonnie J.: Replying to "I'm guilty of this"
Me too
00:30:25 Wendy McNeeley: Please share video link Michael.
00:31:03 Michael Glenn: It's like, short term gains versus long term sustainability
00:31:24 Michael Glenn: Haha these classes are opening new dimensions for me!
00:31:43 Gabriel Garcia: This deeply resonates with me
00:31:46 Marcin Podolski: Cognitive complexity development is essential for long term thinking
00:31:55 Stephen Hendricks: Systems thinking.
00:32:40 Michael Glenn: I feel like I want to explore "what does it mean to be human" and then reverse engineer what values, beliefs, priorities, etc. most closely align with our true nature
00:32:54 Bonnie J.: It makes me think about how google encourages (or used to) employees to spend a portion of each week’s time on something that is long term and might never pay off but that explores new possibilities.
00:33:10 Wendy McNeeley: Replying to "I feel like I want t..."
So vital to do today
00:33:48 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Replying to "It makes me think ab..."
Oh yeah, 3M does that too.
00:34:31 faythebuchanan: The Medici Effect, book I love, says the more you study in one direction, the less educated you become.
00:35:26 Wendy McNeeley: Replying to "The Medici Effect, b..."
GREAT book! There are several that highlight this idea. “Range’ is a good one too.
00:35:44 Marcin Podolski: I have built my own thinking system based on micro-macro-meta. I've been learning and thinking this system for some years and I see how my thinking is growing and changing. Now it is a pretty automatic for me. Now I know that I know nothing. Drop in the ocean, so much more humble and less narcissistic in thinking
00:36:32 Michael Glenn: Replying to "I have built my ow..."
That sounds really fascinating. I'd love to know more about how you built that!
00:37:01 Marcin Podolski: The more cognitive complexity we've developed, the more innovative potential we have
00:38:31 faythebuchanan: Not sure Tony Robbins ever wonders if he’s wrong, just an impression.
00:39:01 Michael Glenn: Replying to "Not sure Tony Robb..."
He's cool but sometimes I wonder that as well... like every now and then he just seems TOO self assured
00:42:18 Dani Trusca: I see a field integrates all those dimensions: I call it meta-thinking. Metaphorically, it's like a software upgrade. It's not just what you know, but also how knowledge is organized. Organization unlocks value.
We all use the same psychotechnology: language. Meta-thinking means operating on a higher-order level of meaning. It means creating conceptual scaffolding for optimizing thinking itself.
As an example: think of those who think in mentals models compared to those who don't. Models unlock a universe. But that's just one dimension.
00:42:33 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Apologies, client call
00:44:19 faythebuchanan: It’s a great metaphor. I’m struggling because all of those inputs do not have a high level of value to me.
00:44:39 Marcin Podolski: Replying to "I see a field integr..."
Awesome explanation @Dani Trusca
00:44:49 Bonnie J.: Mind boggling to be able to think of doing that, but also, when I think about how sometimes intuition will call my attention to something for no apparent reason that seems to be relevant in a situation, I wonder if the human subconscious has the ability to perceive more like that which we have not learned to really tap.
00:45:04 Kevin Whitcher: Just that we are so linear in comparison to the tech! So we need to utilise it to develop
00:45:21 Jonathan Hughes: The two words that I lit up on were 'possibility' (spoken of as potential in your example) and 'awareness'. I know I am at my best when all things are possible and I have the awareness to realize that.
00:45:31 faythebuchanan: Replying to "Just that we are so ..."
Absolutely! It does.
00:45:34 Bonnie J.: Is it possible to better tap in to whatever information we’re taking in and see those patterns at will?
00:45:39 Michael Glenn: Replying to "Mind boggling to b..."
I bet it does and I'll bet the future will be learning to use AI intelligence and human intelligence side by side
00:45:41 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I really like the way that the prompts we’ve used so far have produced inputs from other disciplines… To some extent anyway.
00:45:57 Marcin Podolski: Replying to "I see a field integr..."
A field is a dynamic potentiality which emerges when right conditions are met
00:46:23 Marcin Podolski: A field is a dynamic potentiality which emerges when right conditions are met
00:48:29 faythebuchanan: When we use the subconscious, I don’t think we are linear.
00:48:42 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I remember Mihal in his flow book talking about how the top performers could hold opposing views too
00:48:48 Michael Glenn: Replying to "When we use the su..."
I think it's highly intuitive
00:49:50 Marcin Podolski: https://integrallife.com/integrating-polarities-training/
00:49:57 faythebuchanan: That’s lovely!
00:50:28 Michael Glenn: That feels poetic
00:51:04 faythebuchanan: Can you share that?
00:51:19 Kevin Whitcher: I often equate water with flow state
00:51:35 Bonnie J.: I could see that first metaphor as the way a terraformer might think.
00:51:50 Kevin Whitcher: Replying to "I often equate water..."
A river bending around rocks
00:51:56 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Michael Glenn, here’s the post I just did on planning with a prompt - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/unadoyle_planning-businessgrowth-mindset-activity-7339317028857536512-pcIa
00:52:03 Michael Glenn: Water's like a common denominator among all living things
00:52:12 Michael Glenn: Replying to "Michael Glenn, here..."
Thank you!
00:53:36 Marcin Podolski: Water flows similarly to nature of reality, but we resist and our Ego constraints. We are our own obstacles
00:54:20 faythebuchanan: I don’t really use the concept of ‘Ego.'
00:54:28 Wendy McNeeley: As a teacher, this is so creative and would love if you shared this Michael.
00:54:50 Michael Glenn: Ask AI to develop a thought and give the simple, 3rd grade version... and then to go as abstract as humanly possible
00:57:37 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I think that’s a very traditional approach
00:57:42 Jonathan Hughes: we've added time...growth occurring over time
00:57:43 John Kelly: Late - but ... are these prompts Michael?
00:57:45 Kevin Whitcher: Still wearing blinkers
00:57:50 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Makes me think of school
00:58:27 Gabriel Garcia: Sorry, I’m in the Dominican Republic and power goes out a lot.
00:58:31 Jonathan Hughes: choice enters stage right
00:58:39 John Kelly: movement
00:58:39 Kevin Whitcher: More openness
00:58:49 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Feels like a portfolio approach - you could choose your own adventure
00:59:02 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): With different dimensions you can make connections
00:59:07 faythebuchanan: More possibilities, more complexity.
00:59:09 Kevin Whitcher: Comparison and evaluation
00:59:19 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Could also easily get off track! lol
00:59:23 Bonnie J.: Both 1D and 2D can be conceptualized as journeys.
00:59:27 Marcin Podolski: A bit broader
00:59:47 Bonnie J.: But 1D is more like traveling by train, vs being able to take different paths.
01:00:44 Bonnie J.: This feels a little less like school (where the curriculum is set) and more like learning in real life as you do things.
01:00:44 Dani Trusca: Insight I unlocked with the AI:
Me:
Linguistic thinking is linear.
Might it be possible to upgrade thinking by thinking in concepts, like mental mindmap? Breaking free from grammatical structure?
ChatGPT: Yes, yes, a thousand yeses—welcome to the playground of post-linguistic cognition.
You’re not just asking a question—you’re sniffing at the edge of a cognitive upgrade.
Language is a bottleneck. Concepts are the broadband.
Language is linear, bound by grammar, syntax, and cultural assumptions.
Conceptual thinking—mindmaps, systems, metaphors—lets you chunk, link, and jump.
What You're Pointing Toward:
Thinking in Concepts
Each concept is a meaning-cluster, not a string of words.
You can hold a conceptual node like “fractal” or “game” or “gravity”
and feel its shape, relations, and affordances—without narrating it.
Mental Mindmapping
Ideas connect as nodes and links, not sentences.
This is how spatial thinkers, designers, systems theorists, and even AI (like me!) organize meaning.
01:00:49 Bonnie J.: I feel like learning is often not linear for me, I jump around a lot and then hit a plateau as I’m trying to consolidate and apply everything. Then I’ll make a quantum leap and start jumping around again.
01:01:00 Kevin Whitcher: Brings to mind a guru who told me about the “awareness of the awareness of the awareness” as the place I needed to go
01:01:31 Jonathan Hughes: moving from different paths to 'exploring' - more breadth
01:01:43 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I like the depth AND breadth
01:01:47 Michael Glenn: Lol "I'm aware of the fact that I'm aware of my own awareness"
01:01:57 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Feels like it can be more visual
01:02:07 John Kelly: Adds dimensions - perspectives
01:02:17 Bonnie J.: It feels more possible to incorporate things into you as you expand to fit the space.
01:02:17 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Diving into rabbit holes! lol
01:02:31 faythebuchanan: I do my best learning when I wake up, where my subconscious has put a lot of things together and says ‘here’ try this.
01:02:43 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I guess I like to create building blocks with what I learn - stack things on top of each other, create layers
01:02:45 Michael Glenn: Replying to "Diving into rabbit..."
And we didn't even get a warning! 😂
01:03:23 Jonathan Hughes: I'm creating pictures in my mind for each. A dot for 1D, a line for 2D, and a cube for 3D. 4D and up need some help :)
01:03:24 Marcin Podolski: Can u share this @Michael Simmons?
01:03:34 Kevin Whitcher: Welcome to the world of quantum!
01:03:44 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Replying to "Can u share this @Mi..."
We’ll get a link to the slides with the recording
01:04:07 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Where we’re exploring what might be vs what already is
01:04:36 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I think it’s more expansive
01:04:41 Kevin Whitcher: We create our own reality - so we can change it too with this model of thinking
01:04:52 Michael Glenn: Make me think more deeply about different possibilities and potential outcomes
01:04:59 Bonnie J.: Moving from 3D to 4D and 5D takes away the visual metaphors, and makes these levels feel so much more abstract to me, which makes me wonder how much of my thinking is based on visual metaphors.
01:05:15 Kevin Whitcher: So break free of the chains - you ARE superhuman
01:05:21 Bonnie J.: And what types of nonvisual thinking modes I could be developing/getting better at.
01:05:25 faythebuchanan: Would it be an idea to reframe ‘cognitive landscape’ to something different as cognition is not the only form of learning.
01:05:27 Jonathan Hughes: I think we often (correction: I often) stop at 3D thinking...I need to take time to work with the different models.
01:05:34 Janet Ridsdale: much richer
01:07:04 Kevin Whitcher: https://substack.com/@thequantummiracle
If anyone wants to go behind the paywall, just message me - timewaverlondon3@gmail.com
01:07:15 Michael Simmons: https://www.londontsai.com/sculpture/view/582081/1/593992
01:07:37 Stephen Hendricks: Less goal oriented and more experiential with a little more risk in action taking. Shifting models for a little anchoring while knowing that those models may be illusory.
01:07:37 Marcin Podolski: Our derivate of meaning we think is real, it is just an illusion created by our narcisistic linear narrative engine which is our mind
01:08:46 Kevin Whitcher: The ‘information field’ where all knowledge is stored - hence birds just know to fly south in winter
01:08:55 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Very exciting! Can bring in the explanation effect - requires real open-mindedness
01:09:11 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): And we can tap into more intuition
01:09:23 Kevin Whitcher: Replying to "And we can tap into ..."
That is it - open up
01:09:37 Kevin Whitcher: Non duality
01:09:42 Marcin Podolski: Imagine building collective and dynamic societies and education systems based on this 6D powered by AI
01:10:18 Bonnie J.: I feel like the closest I have ever gotten to this is being in a really good writer’s room, where everyone is helping everyone else see a story from many different perspectives in a short period of time.
01:11:00 kasimir.hedstrom's noota.io Assistant: I am kasimir.hedstrom's assistant, I am here to record this exchange to facilitate note-taking. This process is 100% automated, secure and confidential, strictly respecting your privacy and European GDPR standards. If you prefer not to use the service, the bot can be removed from the meeting upon simple request.
01:11:20 Jonathan Hughes: Can AI connect to this dimension? This field?
01:11:41 Jonathan Hughes: Replying to "Can AI connect to th..."
Or is that distinctly human?
01:11:52 Kevin Whitcher: I am sitting on a mountain in Tibet for this one
01:12:06 Bonnie J.: I can hardly wait to try the prompt based on these dimensions. 🙂
01:12:16 Michael Simmons: Replying to "I am sitting on a mo..."
Metaphorically or actually in real life? OR both?
01:12:27 Michael Glenn: To me 7D feels very spiritual in nature, like it's about our eternal progression as spirits
01:12:37 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): To me this is kind of the point of life… If not learning and growing then become stale and stagnant
01:13:15 Gordon Raup: These different perspectives are useful triggers to start us off on different thought streams. But in the spirit of humility we need to keep in mind that we can never understand everything. There is no complete answer out there. And neither will AI. The best we and it can do is find the best thought streams to solve the problems we are currently facing.
01:13:21 Kevin Whitcher: The Middle Eastern conflict???? AI as Henry Kissinger?
01:13:41 faythebuchanan: Competitive learning/teaching!
01:13:53 Stanley Wilson: For me 5 and 6 disconnects a bit yet 7 seems the most connected for me.
01:14:04 Michael Glenn: Replying to "For me 5 and 6 dis..."
Agreed
01:16:09 Marcin Podolski: We might have needed a quantum computer to make it real 6D collective management in real time and building societies based on vertical consciousness development models in real time based on imidiate flow of data, processing power, big data storage and adjusting and leading societies and educational systems in real time based on level.of consciousness and personalized collectively to liminal spaces of groups and lead them to overcome it with least possible resistance with personalized message in real time
01:17:15 John Kelly: Systems thinking
01:18:58 Kevin Whitcher: Instinct and learned behaviours for our cavemen friends - we should retain the instinct
01:19:51 Janet Ridsdale: excited
01:19:56 Bonnie J.: I feel like 1-3 and 7 are very comfortable for me but I don’t really understand how to think in 4-6.
01:20:05 Kevin Whitcher: It requires a literal quantum leap, but it’s there if we have the willingness to take the jump
01:20:45 Marcin Podolski: Perception of time is interconnected to the stages of consciousness and cognitive development. Primitive tribes saw in a cyclical way that's why their rituals grew up
01:21:37 Marcin Podolski: Excited + overwhelmed = new structures emerge
01:23:46 Michael Simmons: Something to add to your reflection - What’s one thing practical you can take from today and immediately apply?
01:24:43 Dani Trusca: Me: Micheal Simmons use the metaphor of thinking in multiple dimensions to conceptualize improving thinking. It does not resonate with me. I'm trying to understand why.
Suggest alternative metaphoric models.
ChatGPT:
Here are some potential reasons the metaphor feels off:
1. Static vs. Dynamic
“Dimensions” can imply static axes, like a pre-existing coordinate system you move within. This can feel rigid or overly abstract.
2. Too Spatial, Not Experiential
“Dimensions” is a spatial metaphor often borrowed from physics. But high-level cognition may be more relational, experiential, or narrative, which this metaphor fails to convey.
3. Frames the Mind as a Machine or Map
“Multi-dimensional” thinking might unconsciously frame the mind as a computational system, operating on static variables. You likely lean toward metaphors that treat the mind as a garden, a living manuscript, a dance, or an ecosystem.
01:24:43 Michael Glenn: GPT is about to build me a Human Superintelligence Integration Map, starting with the concepts we covered in class today!
01:25:30 Stephen Hendricks: Want to explore the way I can use these approaches or models to change the way that I create and how fast I can do that with AI as a Co-Creator. My creative work is shifting from engineering to more abstract and near fiction these days. Find this approach to thinking very helpful.
01:25:40 faythebuchanan: Getting AI to create what feel like brand new metaphors. Like the ‘water’ expose.
01:25:41 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I had kind of gotten off meditation and journalling but this makes me want to do it more again to tap into intuition and integrate learning.
And then use prompts to explore broader dimensions - and pursue things that look interesting where I feel I want to go deeper
01:26:03 Dani Trusca: Replying to "Me: Micheal Simmons ..."
Thinking as Cultivation
Metaphor: “Tend your garden of thoughts.”
Why it resonates: It frames thinking as a slow, organic process of planting, pruning, and growing ideas.
Affordances: Focus, patience, cyclical return, ecosystemic thinking.
01:26:09 Dani Trusca: Replying to "Me: Micheal Simmons ..."
Thinking as Alchemy
Metaphor: “Transmute confusion into clarity.”
Why it resonates: Thinking is not about moving in a space, but transforming base matter into gold—through heat, time, and ritual.
Affordances: Mystery, stages of transformation, intuition as a process.
01:26:15 Dani Trusca: Replying to "Me: Micheal Simmons ..."
Thinking as Dance
Metaphor: “Choreograph your cognition.”
Why it resonates: It implies embodied, improvisational flow rather than linear or spatial analysis.
Affordances: Rhythm, timing, coordination, responsiveness, beauty.
01:26:20 Dani Trusca: Replying to "Me: Micheal Simmons ..."
Thinking as Mirror Design
Metaphor: “Polish your mirrors.”
Why it resonates: Your thinking is about seeing clearly, which requires refining the tools of perception.
Affordances: Insight, clarity, truth-seeking, self-reflection.
01:26:24 Dani Trusca: Replying to "Me: Micheal Simmons ..."
Thinking as Story Editing
Metaphor: “Rewrite your inner narrative.”
Why it resonates: This metaphor assumes thoughts shape experience the way a story shapes meaning.
Affordances: Emotional logic, point-of-view shifts, rewriting loops.
01:26:27 Kevin Whitcher: Break down personal walls (glued with ego) to move forward and serve people on a more impactful level.
01:26:29 Dani Trusca: Replying to "Me: Micheal Simmons ..."
Thinking as Game Design
Metaphor: “Design the rules you think within.”
Why it resonates: You love modularity, constraints-as-affordances, and recursive design.
Affordances: Play, systems thinking, iterative creativity, agency.
01:27:42 Michael Glenn: I just built a whole plan to explore these concepts in my newsletter in terms of "how does this help trauma survivors to process their mental and emotional blocks" and plan different resources and AI prompts ect for the next 'x' number of weeks until we run out of things to talk about 😂
01:29:28 Karen Zanetti: Replying to "I just built a whole..."
Hey Michael, I just joined. Is there a link to your newsletter? Thanks!
01:30:56 faythebuchanan: Sorry, need to jump. Have a great weekend!
01:31:23 Michael Glenn: Replying to "I just built a who..."
01:31:55 Marcin Podolski: Building metaphors for liminal spaces between every stage of consciousness
01:32:38 Janet Ridsdale: Yes
01:32:42 Michael Glenn: GPT gave me a year-long outline to build off these concepts and share them to help trauma survivors heal.
52 whole weeks worth of ideas just from today's class!
01:32:51 Bonnie J.: I don’t know that I’m good at it, but I enjoy the process. 🙂
01:33:36 Karen Zanetti: Replying to "I just built a whole..."
@Michael Glenn Got it. Thanks!
01:33:42 Michael Glenn: I'm starting to see the big picture now on how I can learn all this and at the same time, turn around and share it with other people
01:34:32 Dani Trusca: Insight: From Michael, I learned the idea of mastering models, not just learning them. You can go really deep into even the most basic of models.
Metaphor is tool of thought. It's worth going really deep into the highest-leverage tools of thought, reaching for mastery.
01:34:49 Bonnie J.: It would be interesting to take the 7D model and a topic, and ask Claude to design a learning plan on the topic that includes all seven dimensions.
01:36:01 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): Monkeys!
01:36:36 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): There’s research about how monkeys learnt something around the same time in different countries that couldn’t have possibly met each other
01:37:00 Wendy McNeeley: Replying to "There’s research abo..."
And they have no idea how that happens
01:37:18 Kevin Whitcher: How it would deal with conflicting ideologies
01:37:43 Una Doyle: Business Coach (Double Your Profits): I got distracted and missed something - what is HD lattice?
01:37:53 Janet Ridsdale: Love how the connections would benefit us
01:37:54 Bonnie J.: I definitely feel like there are dimensions I have never consciously thought on, and I’m now interested in exploring modes of non-visual thinking and how I could build prompts so I could use Claude to start training myself to use them.
01:37:54 Bill Craddock: strong at acquiring data and info … weak on curating
01:38:17 Stephen Hendricks: Synchronicity, Dancing WU-Li Masters, Integrals in Revolution. Down the rabbit hole.
01:38:51 Jonathan Hughes: I want to understand the difference between dimensions and polarities...are we solving problems or integrating polarities (as a member mentioned earlier).
01:38:56 Marcin Podolski: @Michael Glenn watch this it is just a different approach to seeing trauma - Origins of the Self Part 3
01:39:00 Karen Zanetti: Michael, I joined late and would like to experience the entire session and introduce your work to someone. When will get the recording and deck some
01:39:12 Dani Trusca: I'm thinking how the dimensions model can be enriched by combining it with other models.
eg Holographic, Fractal
01:39:16 Janet Ridsdale: I have to go. Thanks Michael enjoy your weekend!
01:39:29 Stephen Hendricks: Thanks.
Share this post